Strayhorn v. . Blalock
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Special proceediNO begun in the Superior Court, before the Clerk thereof, of Dukhají county. The clerk having granted the motion of defendants to dismiss the proceeding, the plaintiff appealed to the judge at Chambers. On the hearing before Philips, Judge, at Chambers, the order of the clerk was reversed and the case remanded to the clerk. From this judgment of the Court the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMekriMON, J.
This was a special proceeding begun in the Superior Court, before the clerk thereof, on the 29th day of August, 1884, commanding defendants to appear on the 12th day of September, 1884. The summons was returned September 5th, 1884, with the following endorsement:
“Received . 188... Served September 5th, 1884, on
the defendants, I). W. Blalock, A. N. Blalock, J. R. Blalock and Rufus Blalock. Fee $2.40.
J. R. Blalock,
Sheriff Durham County.
On the 12th chi}'' of September, 1884, the defendants entered a special appearance through their attorney, and moved to dismiss the action for three causes:
1.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brittain v. . MullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Guion and Wife v. . Melvin .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Weiller & Co. v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hassell v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Lake Drainage Commissioners v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Isley v. . BoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Williamson v. . CockeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.