Legal Opinion

State v. Douglas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1985No. 84-1806PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the bind-over of appellee was properly accomplished in compliance with R.C. 2151.26 and Juv. R. 30. We find that the bind-over was properly ordered, and thus we reverse the decision of the court of appeals.

R.C. 2151.26 and Juv. R. 30 set forth the procedure to be followed by a juvenile court in a bind-over situation. R.C. 2151.26(A)1 lists the determinations required to be made by the juvenile court before jurisdiction over a juvenile delinquent can be relinquished to the general division. Subdivision (3)(a) of this section requires, inter alia, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CarmichaelOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. OviedoOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In re A.J.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In re M.P.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API