State v. Douglas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the bind-over of appellee was properly accomplished in compliance with R.C. 2151.26 and Juv. R. 30. We find that the bind-over was properly ordered, and thus we reverse the decision of the court of appeals.
R.C. 2151.26 and Juv. R. 30 set forth the procedure to be followed by a juvenile court in a bind-over situation. R.C. 2151.26(A)1 lists the determinations required to be made by the juvenile court before jurisdiction over a juvenile delinquent can be relinquished to the general division. Subdivision (3)(a) of this section requires, inter alia, a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. CarmichaelOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. OviedoOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- In re A.J.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- In re M.P.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.