Legal Opinion
State v. Watson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1989No. 88-1897PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.
The question before us is whether the juvenile court abused its discretion when it relinquished jurisdiction over appellant pursuant to Juv. R. 30. For the reasons which follow, we find that it did not.
Juv. R. 30 provides in pertinent part:
“(C) The proceedings may be transferred [to the general division of the common pleas court] if the court finds there are reasonable grounds to believe:
“(1) The child is not amenable to care or rehabilitation in any facility designed for the care, supervision and rehabilitation of delinquent children; and
“(2) The safety of the community may require that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. CarmichaelOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. DouglasOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. OviedoOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- In re A.J.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- In re M.P.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GolphinOhio Supreme Court · 1998
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.