State v. Carmichael

The appellant in this cause directs the full thrust of his argument at the alleged use of hearsay evidence in the report from the Ohio Youth Commission Juvenile Diagnostic Center. While it is true that the psychiatrists and psychologists did not appear to testify concerning their examinations of Charles E. Carmichael, it is equally trae that they were pever called, nqr was any ef*4fort made to call them hy defense counsel, even though counsel had access to those documents for more than two months prior to the hearing. Nor did counsel, if he intended to make an issue of his client’s “amenability…