Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1982No. Nos. 80-1760 and 80-1761PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.

R. C. 2151.26 and Juv. R. 30 provide the procedural mechanism by which a juvenile offender may be “bound over” to the adult court, and then tried as though he were an adult. In the instant case, this procedure was followed in Summit County, but was followed for each juvenile as to the charges stemming from only one of the two robberies committed in Lake County. Therefore, the central issue raised by these appeals and cross-appeal is whether the defendants were effectively bound over on all the offenses for which they were ultimately indicted, thus rendering all their convictions valid,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. KlingenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In Re BennOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. D.W.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. D.W.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. DouglasOhio Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API