Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of Boston, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided September 23, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, J.

John Duffy, D.C., d/b/a Waltham Chiropractic (“Duffy”), claiming the status of an unpaid party under G.L.c. 90, §34M, commenced an action against Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Boston, Inc. (“Enterprise”) for personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits in payment of treatment provided by Duffy to Jacques Joseph (“Joseph”). Duffy asserted violations of §34M and G.Lc. 93A, §11. Prior to the scheduling of a pretrial conference, Enterprise paid Duffy the full amount of the claim. Citing Fascione v. CNA Ins. Cos., 435 Mass. 88 (2001), Enterprise moved for summary judgment on the §34M claim on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Massachusetts Employers Insurance Exchange v. Propac-Mass, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Essex Chiropractic Office v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012
  2. Hartunian v. Pilgrim InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API