Legal Opinion
Massachusetts Employers Insurance Exchange v. Propac-Mass, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 11, 1995PublishedCited by 137 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether the plaintiff, an unincorporated domestic reciprocal insurance exchange (Exchange), created pursuant to G. L. c. 175, §§ 94A-94M (1992 ed.), lawfully terminated its attorney-in-fact agreement (agreement) with the defendant (Propac). Under the agreement, Propac agreed to perform certain management service functions in providing workers’ compensation insurance to members of the Exchange. The Exchange was established under the auspices of the plaintiff Associated Industries of Massachusetts, Inc. A Superior Court judge ruled that the Exchange had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Atkinson v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- T.W. Nickerson, Inc. v. Fleet National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Cambridge Plating Co. v. Napco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Community Builders, Inc. v. Indian Motocycle Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Seven Provinces InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Roy R. Damon and Eleanor M. Damon v. Sun Company, Inc., Roy R. Damon and Eleanor M. Damon v. Sun Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.