Legal Opinion

Eversharp, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 12, 1956No. 593-53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The basis for the plaintiff’s suit is that the Government collected from it six percent interest on money which the plaintiff had to repay to the Government as a result of a renegotiation order, and that the Government should have collected only a reasonable rate of interest, which would have been four percent.

The Government filed a motion to dismiss, which we overruled, 129 C. Cls. 772. Now both parties have filed motions for summary judgment. There is no issue of fact to be resolved. Our recital of the facts will be brief. They are more fully stated in our former opinion.

The plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eversharp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Sportwear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Putnam Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  2. Eversharp, Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API