Legal Opinion
United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Sportwear, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 5, 1951No. 10396-10398PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
These three cases involve suits by the United States against manufacturers for balances claimed under the Renegotiation Acts. 1 While the litigation in the District Court presented many points 2 the question here is greatly narrowed. It pertains to the government’s right to recover interest. Narrowed still further it is whether the District Court’s allowance of 2%% interest against the defendants is correct.
The argument for the United States is that 6% should have been allowed. This amount should have been allowed, it is argued, on either of two grounds: One is that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Railroad Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. Bonnell Bonnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Sampson Motors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reserve Supply Corporation of L. I., Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Riverview Packing Co., Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Riverview Packing Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Wissahickon Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Eversharp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.