Legal Opinion

Putnam Tool Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 16, 1957No. 186-56PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MaddeN, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

The plaintiff is a corporation which has succeeded to the rights and obligations of a former partnership. In this opinion the word plaintiff will be used to designate the partnership, and, in its turn, the corporation.

The plaintiff sues to recover a sum which represents the difference between the 4 percent interest which it says it should have been charged, and the 6 percent interest which it was in fact charged, on its indebtedness to the Government resulting from a renegotiation of war contracts performed by it for the Government.

By a notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  2. Eversharp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Eversharp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. Eastport Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. District of Columbia v. John Chester BradyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. United States v. STATE TAX COM'N OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPIDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1972
  4. American Metal Company v. M/V BELLEVILLEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  5. Olympic Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API