Legal Opinion

Eversharp, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 2, 1954No. 593-53PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff sues because the Government charged it six percent interest on money which it owed the Government. The plaintiff says it should have been charged only four percent and it sues for the difference.

On August 6, 1946, the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board entered a unilateral order determining that for the year ended December 31,1944, the plaintiff had realized excessive profits in an amount which required it to repay $304,228.52 to the United States, together with interest at six percent on that sum from August 21, 1946. This type of order, at least as to the principal sum, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carriso, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Sportwear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. Ring Const. Corp. v. United States United States v. Ring Const. CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  4. Ross Packing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1942
  5. United States v. Ring Const. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. South Puerto Rico Sugar Company Trading Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Mallow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Fireman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API