Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. 91st Street Joint Venture

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 5, 2003No. 1356Published

1Opinion of the Court

SALMON, Judge.

This appeal concerns another engagement in an ongoing war between Edward S. Goldstein and entities controlled by Malcolm Berman. Facts related to other battles between these litigants have been discussed by us in 91st Street Joint Venture v. Goldstein, 114 Md.App. 561, 691 A.2d 272 (1997) (“Goldstein I”), and Goldstein v. 91st Street Joint Venture, 131 Md.App. 546, 750 A.2d 602, cert. denied, 360 Md. 273, 757 A.2d 809 (2000) (“Goldstein II”).

I. BACKGROUND

The 91st Street Joint Venture is a Maryland general partnership, whose partners are Joint Venture Holding, Inc., Princess…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Creel v. LillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Read v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Mitchell v. Alpha Hardware & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Citibank Federal Savings Bank v. New Plan Realty TrustCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API