Legal Opinion
State v. MacHuzak
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 18, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
227 N.J. Super. 279 (1988)
546 A.2d 1099
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DANIEL MACHUZAK, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Somerset County.
Decided April 18, 1988.
Nicholas L. Bissell, Jr. for plaintiff, State of New Jersey (Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney).
Mary E. Deal, for defendant.
PAUL T. MURPHY, J.S.C.
The defendant, Daniel Machuzak, was convicted in the Municipal Court, Montgomery Township, for driving while intoxicated in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50. The statute under which defendant was convicted, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50, provides that a person who operates a motor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dacunzo v. EdgyeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Newark Firemen's Mutual Benevolent Ass'n v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Lackovic v. New England Paper Tube Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- State v. WeanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Belfer v. BorrellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stonehill Property Owners Ass'n v. Township of VernonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Rainhold Holding Co. v. Freehold TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1994
- State v. LopesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Rugala v. NJ INS. UNDERWRITINGNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- City of Montesano v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.