Legal Opinion

Belfer v. Borrella

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 25, 1950PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

9 N.J. Super. 287 (1950)

76 A.2d 25

JACOB J. BELFER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

D. DONALD BORRELLA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 9, 1950.

Decided October 25, 1950.

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

Mr. Nathan N. Schildkraut argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Kahn & Schildkraut, attorneys).

Mr. Frank I. Casey argued the cause for the defendant-appellant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

The issue here is whether the defendant-appellant, D. Donald Borrella, complied with the provisions of P.L.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Newark v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Adams v. County of AtlanticSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  3. Burke v. KennyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Maguire v. VanmeterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  5. Baader v. MascellinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cammarata v. Essex County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Swede v. City of CliftonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. AbagnaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Union Cty. Bd. of Freeholders v. Union Cty. Park Comm'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Publix Asbury Corp., Inc. v. City of Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API