Legal Opinion

Lackovic v. New England Paper Tube Co., Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 19, 1974PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

127 N.J. Super. 394 (1974)

317 A.2d 426

KAROL LACKOVIC AND LEOPOLDINA LACKOVIC, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

NEW ENGLAND PAPER TUBE CO., INC. AND D.F. DUBOIS, DEFENDANTS. KAROL LACKOVIC AND LEOPOLDINA LACKOVIC, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

PETER VOGEL, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided March 19, 1974.

Mr. Charles Rodgers argued the cause for the plaintiffs (Breslin & Breslin, attorneys).

Mr. Glenn T. Leonard argued the cause for the defendant, New England Paper Tube Co., Inc., (Mr. Samuel M. Lyon, Jr., attorney).

Mr. Richard J. Sauerwein argued the cause for the defendant, Peter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barringer v. MieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Lemke v. BaileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Egan v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Gotheiner v. LenihanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  5. Whalen v. YoungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HudesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Cohn v. G. D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
  3. Susan Cohn and Walter Cohn, Her Husband v. G.D. Searle & Co., Irwin I. Kimmelman, Esq., Attorney General of New Jersey, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  4. Hopkins v. Kelsey-Hayes, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
  5. Miletta v. DoeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API