Legal Opinion

City of Montesano v. Wells

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 16, 1995No. 17853-2-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFleisher, J.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether a bicyclist can be charged under the law prohibiting driving a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (DUI). Holding that the Legislature intended the law to apply to motor vehicles only, we reverse Daniel Wells’s DUI conviction.

Facts

At about 3 a.m. on June 14, 1992, Daniel Wells was riding his bicycle on a back street in Montesano. Officer Steve Needham pulled him over after observing Wells swerving and making very wide turns. Officer Needham testified that Wells’s speech was slurred, that he smelled of intoxicants, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re EatonWashington Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Travelers Commercial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. HuberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API