Legal Opinion
Peto v. Ruschak
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 2015No. 27614PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Peto v. Ruschak,
2015-Ohio-5538.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) JOHN A. PETO C.A. No. 27614 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JIM RUSCHAK, et al. STOW MUNICIPAL COURT COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO Appellees CASE No. 2013 CVI 2305 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: December 31, 2015 HENSAL, Presiding Judge. {¶1} John Peto appeals an order of the Stow Municipal Court that ordered him to pay $11,280 in attorney’s fees to Jim Ruschak and Progressive Realty Associates of Ohio, Inc. For the following reasons, this Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Ceol v. Zion Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Bardwell v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Alligood v. Procter & Gamble Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robson v. Discount Drug Mart, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Klossner v. BurrOhio Court of Appeals · 2018