Legal Opinion

Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1996No. 95-313PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The issue before the court is whether a deed which severs a mineral estate from a surface estate, which is drafted after the advent of strip mining in the region, and which grants the right to use the surface incident to mining coal, in language peculiarly applicable to deep-mining techniques, reserves the right to remove coal by strip-mining methods.

The parties agree that each possesses precisely the same property rights as their predecessors in interest, the signatories to the original deeds. Their respective rights, therefore, are determined by our construction of the 1955 and 1962 deeds…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Shifrin v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Savedoff v. Access Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Aerel, S.R.L. v. Pcc Airfoils, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Pmc, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Diamond Wine & Spirits, Inc. v. Dayton Heidelberg Distributing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API