Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Holt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 14, 1989No. 87 C 30995; CA A46621PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

Husband1 appeals and wife cross-appeals from an amended dissolution judgment.2 The issues are property division, spousal support, and attorney fees. On de novo review, we modify the judgment and affirm it as modified.

Husband, then 34, and wife, then 26, began dating in 1976, and on July 1, 1978, began cohabiting in a house that husband owned in Lebanon. Wife’s sons from a previous marriage lived with them. In November, 1979, the parties bought and moved into a house in Salem. They made a $16,500 down payment, of which wife contributed $4,000 and husband, $12,500. Husband testified that only…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In re the Marriage of FrishkoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. In re the Marriage of CaverlyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. In re the Marriage of KilpatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of DullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. In Re the Marriage of CrumpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. In re the Marriage of RolieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. In re the Marriage of WightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API