Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Caverly

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1983No. 15-80-06792; CA A25471PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Wife appeals from a decree of dissolution, claiming that the trial court erred in finding that the marriage was not of long duration, making its distribution of property and failing to award her permanent spousal support. We modify the property distribution but otherwise affirm.

The parties began living together in 1970. They were married in February, 1973, and separated in July, 1980, after seven and one-half years of marriage. At the time of the decree, wife was 67 years old and husband was 65. Neither party is in good health. Wife, who is unemployed, receives $229 monthly in Social Security…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of Olinger and OlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. In re the Marriage of MasseeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. In re the Marriage of KampmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. In re the Marriage of HoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. In the Matter of Marriage of Timm and TimmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API