Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Dull

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 7, 1990No. 88-5-270; A61874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

In this appeal from a dissolution judgment, husband contends that the trial court erred in its division of property and in awarding wife spousal support and attorney fees. We affirm.

The parties lived together for two years before their marriage in 1984. A dissolution judgment was entered in August,' 1988. Both parties were 49 years of age at the time of trial. No children were born of the marriage, but both parties had children from previous marriages. Before the marriage, husband lived in wife’s residence for two years, and she paid for most of the parties’ living expenses while he paid off…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Matter of Marriage of JenksOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of KampmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Matter of Marriage of BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Matter of Marriage of FollansbeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. In re the Marriage of Gano-RidgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API