Ex parte Byram
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNCAN, Justice.
David Wayne Byram2 appeals the trial court’s order denying him relief in a pretrial habeas corpus proceeding. He contends the trial court erred in finding the State established “good cause” under article 32.01, Tex. Code Crim. Proo., for failing to indict him during the next grand jury term after his arrest. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s order.
Factual and Procedural Background
Byram was arrested on August 30, 1996 for possessing child pornography and, on September 4, 1996, for indecency with a child. When he had not been indicted on either charge by October…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Watso v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Norton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- State v. Condran, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999