Legal Opinion

Norton v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided January 18, 1996No. 14-95-00114-CRPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED MAJORITY OPINION

EDELMAN, Justice.

Daniel Carl Norton appeals the trial court’s denial of his application for writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the State failed to indict him within two court terms from the date of his arrest. We reverse.

On January 9,1994, appellant was arrested for delivery of marijuana and bond was set. Appellant was released on bond on January 18. On October 6, 1994, an indictment against appellant for delivery of marijuana was issued and filed in the 23rd District Court.

Appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus on October 25, complaining of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Tatum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Ex Parte Knight, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  4. Ngai Van Nguyen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  5. Kim Troung Nix v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Easley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. State v. Condran, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  5. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API