Legal Opinion

State v. Condran

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 25, 1997No. 05-96-01313-CRPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES, Justice.

The State appeals from the district court’s order dismissing the prosecution against ap-pellee Charles Franklin Condran pursuant to article 32.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and barring further prosecution pursuant to article 28.061 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The State asserts three points of error. First, the State contends the district court erred in dismissing appellee’s prosecution because the grand jury indicted appellee before the hearing on appellee’s writ of habeas corpus, and therefore, the issue was moot. Second, the State contends…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Van Hoang v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Armadillo Bail Bonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Young v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API