Legal Opinion

Szarkowski v. Pfister

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1933No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 36,833PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

October 21, 1931, plaintiffs filed a bill to rescind, on the ground of fraud, an exchange of real estate, and for other relief. Defendants deny the fraud charged. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Plaintiffs, prior to the exchange of the property involved, lived in Chicago where plaintiff Frank Szarkowski was a bricklayer. They owned a house and lot in Chicago subject to a mortgage of $2,000. This they exchanged for 60 acres of land in Allegan county, subject to a mortgage to the Federal Land Bank of $2,300, giving* to defendants a second mortgage of $1,200, to boot. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Wright v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Collins v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Maxted v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kundel v. PortzMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Interstate Automatic Transmission Co. v. HarveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Adams v. Edward M. Burke Homes, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Adams v. Edward M. Burke Homes, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Julian G. McIntosh Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Impel Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. State Plumbing & Heating Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API