Legal Opinion

Maxted v. Fowler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1892PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for a breach of warranty alleged to have been made by defendant on an exchange of property owned by plaintiff for stock in a mining corporation transferred to him by the defendant. On a trial before a jury in the Manistee circuit a judgment was rendered for $1,657.50. From this judgment defendant appeals..

The plaintiff’s testimony tended to show that he exchanged property in Manistee, valued at $1,800, for mining stock, which, at 75 cents per share, amounted to $1,300, and $500 in cash; that the defendant exhibited specimens which he claimed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Bradley v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Griesa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Wegner v. HerkimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Pratt v. Allegan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Pinch v. HotalingMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API