Legal Opinion

Interstate Automatic Transmission Co. v. Harvey

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1984No. Docket 67562PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.

Defendants appeal by leave granted an order of the Ingham County Circuit Court denying the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment as to whether plaintiff violated § 16 of the Franchise Investment Law, MCL 445.1516; MSA 19.854(16), entitling defendants to rescission or damages.

Plaintiff, Interstate Auto Transmission Company, Inc., is a national corporation which franchises local businesses to operate automobile transmission repair facilities. Interstate is required to register with the Michigan Department of Commerce, Corporation and Securities Division, in order to sell its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Szarkowski v. PfisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Papciak v. MorawskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McMullen v. JoldersmaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Martino v. Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Two Men & a Truck/International Inc. v. Two Men & a Truck/Kalamazoo, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
  4. Martino v. Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Martino v. Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API