Interstate Automatic Transmission Co. v. Harvey
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.
Defendants appeal by leave granted an order of the Ingham County Circuit Court denying the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment as to whether plaintiff violated § 16 of the Franchise Investment Law, MCL 445.1516; MSA 19.854(16), entitling defendants to rescission or damages.
Plaintiff, Interstate Auto Transmission Company, Inc., is a national corporation which franchises local businesses to operate automobile transmission repair facilities. Interstate is required to register with the Michigan Department of Commerce, Corporation and Securities Division, in order to sell its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Szarkowski v. PfisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Papciak v. MorawskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- McMullen v. JoldersmaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Martino v. Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Two Men & a Truck/International Inc. v. Two Men & a Truck/Kalamazoo, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- Martino v. Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Martino v. Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996