Legal Opinion

Filcek v. Utica Building Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1984No. Docket 58064PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1966, defendant constructed a house. Plaintiffs became remote purchasers of that house in July, 1977, i.e., there were at least two previous owners. Shortly after their purchase, *398plaintiffs discovered defects in the house which they attributed to defendant. On March 20, 1979, plaintiffs filed a two-count complaint against defendant in district court, alleging negligent construction (Count I) and breach of an implied warranty of habitability (Count II). On defendant’s motions, the trial court granted accelerated judgment based on expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, pursuant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bonney v. the Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Southgate Community School District v. West Side Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. v. VickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Thomas v. Process Equipment Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Grimm v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Mielke v. WatermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API