Legal Opinion

Babbitt v. Doe on the demise of Brush

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1853PublishedCited by 13 opinions

ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Ejectment for a tract of land in Franklin county. The cause was submitted to the Court. Judgment was given for the plaintiff below.

Upon the trial it was shown that Edward Brush, on the 11th of August, 1826, died seized of the premises in dispute, leaving Ann Brush, his widow, and the following-named children and heirs at law, viz., Elma Brush, Shadrach Brush, Rebecca Brush, Joseph Brush, and Mary Brush, who, with John L. Hoyt, the husband of the said Rebecca, are the plaintiff’s lessors. At the death of their father the said heirs were all minors, the oldest of them not more than twelve years…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Hough v. CanbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Lincoln v. TowerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · 1841

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Hawkins' AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Booth v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
  3. Abdil v. AbdilIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Crane v. KimmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ford & Co. v. People's BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API