Wise v. Rose
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. Joseph H. Budd, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff and A. B. Spreekels laid a wager of $500 on the result of a horserace to be run on the Stockton course between September 17 and 22,1894, each depositing with the defendant his stake of $500, under an agreement that defendant should pay the stakes ($1,000) to the winner; that before the race was run, and before it was or could have been known or determined whether plaintiff had won or lost the stakes, he repudiated the wager and served written notice of such repudiation upon Spreekels and upon defendant, and, two days thereafter,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gridley v. DornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Johnston v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hill v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by7 opinions
- Janeway & Carpender v. Long Beach Paper & Paint Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Mardesich v. C. J. Hendry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Martin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Matthews v. LopusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- National Stone Tile Corp. v. VoorheisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.