Johnston v. Russell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sanderson, J.:
This is an action upon a promissory note. The defendant pleads payment. Below, judgment passed for defendant upon the following facts, which were found by the Court: First—On the 8th day of September, 1868, plaintiff loaned the defendant eight hundred and fifty dollars, for which defendant gave the promissory note in suit, payable one day after date.
*671Second—On the 28th of September, 1868, plaintiff made a wager with one Freeman that Horatio Seymour would receive a majority of the votes to be cast at the ensuing presidential election in the State of California for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bunn v. RikerNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Yates v. FootCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1814
- Morgan v. GroffNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Bryant v. MeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
- Hardy v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Green v. FrahmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Wassermann v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Gridley v. DornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Wallace v. OpinhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.