Legal Opinion

Martin v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1919No. Civ. No. 2041PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County. John P. Ellison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

PLUMMER, P. J.,

pro tem.—On the fifth day of February, 1917, the plaintiff and one Clyde H. Vincent were traveling eastward in an automobile on Oak Street, in the city of Red Bluff, county of Tehama, and, in so doing, reached a point on said street crossed by the tracks of the defendant • company. There a collision occurred with a gasoline motor-car being propelled northward on the tracks of said company, in which collision Vincent was killed and the plaintiff seriously injured. Plaintiff brought suit to recover for the losses incurred. The action was tried before a jury. A verdict was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. McWhirter v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Pacific Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Springer v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Simmons v. LeightonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Oles v. Kahn Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. AWI Builders, Inc. v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API