State v. Cantrell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, C.J.
Facts of Case
The question presented in this case is whether a police officer must obtain the consent of both the passenger and the driver, where both have approximately equal control of an automobile, before using consent as a basis for a warrantless search of the vehicle.
In our order accepting review of this case, we limited, review to "the issue whether the search of the automobile that respondent was driving can be justified by his passenger’s consent.” Our sole reason for granting review was to determine whether the rule announced in State v. Leach, 113 Wn.2d 735, 782 P.2d 1035 (1989)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FafordWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. FafordWashington Supreme Court · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.