Legal Opinion

State v. Faford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1996No. Nos. 61896-8; 61897-6; 61898-4PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

— Wayne C. Fields eavesdropped on his neighbors’ telephone conversations twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week over several months. Had he used an electronic eavesdropping device to tap a landline to a conventional telephone, Washington’s privacy act (RCW 9.73) would have undoubtedly prohibited Fields’ private surveillance activities. Like many Washington citizens, however, the targeted neighbors were speaking on a cordless telephone, not a conventional telephone. Fields purchased a police scanner specifically to eavesdrop on the radio portion of those cordless telephone conversations…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API