State v. Faford
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
— Wayne C. Fields eavesdropped on his neighbors’ telephone conversations twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week over several months. Had he used an electronic eavesdropping device to tap a landline to a conventional telephone, Washington’s privacy act (RCW 9.73) would have undoubtedly prohibited Fields’ private surveillance activities. Like many Washington citizens, however, the targeted neighbors were speaking on a cordless telephone, not a conventional telephone. Fields purchased a police scanner specifically to eavesdrop on the radio portion of those cordless telephone conversations…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.