State v. Evans
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
Karen Angelini, Justice
The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Preston Mitchell Evans’s motion to suppress, arguing that the trial court erred because Evans’s detention and war-rantless arrest was reasonable under the United States Constitution, the Texas Constitution, and other statutes raised in Evans’s suppression motion. We affirm the order of the trial court.
Background
In the trial court, Evans filed a motion to suppress, arguing that he was illegally detained and subsequently arrested without a warrant and without probable cause in violation of the U.S.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Cameron Mitchell Krenek v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
- Jose Salvador Aguilar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020
- State v. Jamie Lynn Nielsen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
- The State of Texas v. Jesus Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.