First National Bank v. Sateren
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant owned a farm, and in March, 1918, made a contract with one Lindemoen to till and crop it for the farming season of *102that year. The contract contains many provisions not necessary to mention. Throughout Lindemoen is termed the employe of defendant. The instrument is declared a contract of employment and specifies that it shall not be held to be a lease. It was filed for record in the office of the register of deeds of the county where the farm is. During the month following, plaintiff received from Lindemoen a chattel mortgage upon one-half of the crop to be grown upon that farm in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Strangeway v. EisenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Anderson v. ListonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Berry v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Porter v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.