Porter v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court-for Goodhue county, Crosby, J., presiding, refusing a new trial..
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Replevin to recover 444 bushels of wheat-The wheat was grown on a farm belonging to plaintiff, under a contract between him and Henry and A. Linnemann, by which, in substance, he hired and employed them to till and. *302carry on the farm from January 2, 1877, to November 2, 1877, at their own cost and expense; to sow 80 acres in wheat, 10 acres in oats, and 10 acres in corn; to harvest, thresh and clean the grain in good order for market, and before October 15th to place it in bins and places designated by him on the farm, all the work to be done under his orders and directions. In compensation…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Minneapolis Iron Store Co. v. BranumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Strangeway v. EisenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Valerius v. RichardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Bowers v. Graves & Vinton Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.