Legal Opinion
Society of Lloyd's v. Mullin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 27, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-1193PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RUFE, District Judge.
This is an action for enforcement of a foreign judgment. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set out below, Plaintiffs Motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are not in dispute, unless otherwise noted. Plaintiff in this case is The Society of Lloyd’s (“Lloyd’s”), a corporation organized and existing by special Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Lloyd’s is not an insurer, and does not insure risks. Rather, pursuant to a succession of Parliamentary Acts, the Lloyd’s Acts 1871-1982, Lloyd’s is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Haynsworth v. the CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Erbe Elektromedizin GMBH v. CanadyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Novae Corporate Underwriting Ltd. v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- The SOCIETY OF LLOYD'S v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Clientron Corp. v. Devon IT, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Society of Lloyd's v. ReinhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.