Legal Opinion
Feiber v. Home Silk Mills
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided November 13, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Silas Feiber against the Home Silk Mills. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed, and complaint dismissed.
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
The action was brought to recover for the breach of an alleged contract to employ plaintiff as a salesman for a year from February 15, 1913, at $3,000 per annum. The contract is in a letter, which reads:
“We herewith beg to confirm arrangement whereby you are to cover the Western territory for us with the retail trade, salary to be at the rate of $3,000 per annum, and your services to commence on February 15th, unless it is your judgment that it will be wise to start out a little earlier than this; in the meantime we would thank you to unofficially spend as much time as you care to in getting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Outerbridge v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- United States for the Benefit of Collins v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Granger v. American Brewing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Wightman v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hughes v. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
- Gressing v. Musical Instrument Sales Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915