Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 30, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNODGRASS, J.,

This bill was filed to collect a balance of $2625 as salary, and $750 as a bonus, alleged to be due complainant as an employee of the defendants for the year 1923. It is insisted by the complainant that the contract was a yearly contract; that his discharge before it expired was without justification, and that he failed to get, though he diligently sought, other employment during the remaining portion of the year; that of this balance $2625 is due as salary at the rate of $350 per month, and the other is a bonus which under his contract would have been due him at the end of said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Brookfield v. Drury CollegeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Chadwick v. Morris & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Cuppy v. Stollwerck Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. Feiber v. Home Silk MillsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Price v. Mercury Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  2. Savage v. Spur Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API