Hughes v. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
SNODGRASS, J.,
This bill was filed to collect a balance of $2625 as salary, and $750 as a bonus, alleged to be due complainant as an employee of the defendants for the year 1923. It is insisted by the complainant that the contract was a yearly contract; that his discharge before it expired was without justification, and that he failed to get, though he diligently sought, other employment during the remaining portion of the year; that of this balance $2625 is due as salary at the rate of $350 per month, and the other is a bonus which under his contract would have been due him at the end of said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Brookfield v. Drury CollegeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Chadwick v. Morris & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Cuppy v. Stollwerck Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Feiber v. Home Silk MillsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Price v. Mercury Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Savage v. Spur Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949