Legal Opinion

United States for the Benefit of Collins v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 1st day of November, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from respective orders entered in said clerk’s office on the 1st day of November, 1909, denying the defendants’ motions for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J. :

Hughes Brothers & Bangs, a copartnership composed of James Hughes, Eugene Hughes and Anson H. Bangs, entered into a contract with the United States government on the 31st day of July, 1899, for the dredging of Bay Bidge channel and Bed Hook channel in Hew York harbor. The Contractors, pursuant to the act of Congress, approved August 13, 1894 (28 U. S. Stat. at Large, 278, chap. 280; 2 U. S. Comp. Stat. [1901] 2523), gave a bond in which defendant, the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, became the surety. This bond provided, among other things, that the said Hughes Brothers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Mining Co. v. CullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walker v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. In re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. People v. Polar Vent of America, Inc., New York County Courts1957
  4. Feiber v. Home Silk MillsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
  5. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. SalesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API