People v. Devine

Upon trial without jury in the record-

er’s court of the city of Detroit, Clarence DeVine was convicted of being a disorderly person. He has appealed, permission first having been granted. The complaint, in part, reads as follows:

“Clarence DeVine * * *, heretofore, to-wit, on or about the 30th day of September, A. D. 1931, at the city of Detroit, in the county and State aforesaid, was then and there a disorderly person, contrary to the provisions of section 167, of the Michigan penal code for the year 1931 (Act No. 328), in this, to-wit, that he, the said Clarence DeVine was engaged in…