State v. Graves
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Convicted of violating the statute prohibiting the practice of dentistry without a license, defendant has appealed from the judgment.
He contends that the statute, section 5018, G. S. 1913, is unconstitutional because it excludes from practice those who do not hold a diploma from a dental college in good standing. He concedes that, in the exercise of the police power, a state may enact laws designed to protect the public from the evils which result, if ignorant and incompetent persons are permitted to practice medicine or dentistry, provided no arbitrary or unreasonable discrimination…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State v. VandersluisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. LuscherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State v. WoodlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State v. BannockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Graves v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. HammSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Henington v. State Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. SpinatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Gaulke v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.