Legal Opinion

People v. Hux

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Eespondent was convicted of furnishing spirituous liquor to an intoxicated person. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The proceedings in this case were commenced in justice’s court, in which the respondent was charged, under section 2271, How. Stat., with having sold and furnished to one Henry L. Brayton, certain spirituous and intoxicating liquors, he, the said Henry L. Brayton, being then and there an intoxicated person, etc.

Warrant was issued on the eighth day of July, 1887, and respondent apprehended and brought before the court on that day. The charges in the warrant were read to him by the court, and respondent pleaded not guilty. Eespondent then moved the court for an adjournment, and stated to the *478■co…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Galloway v. CorbittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Rawson v. McElvaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People v. ShufeltMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  5. People v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WashburnMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Palmer v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  3. People v. DevineMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. People v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Wetmore v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API