Legal Opinion
Hearn v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1962No. 2965, 2966PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, Associate Judge.
These are appeals from convictions of two charges of indecent exposure in violation of Code 1961 § 22-1112, which prohibits making “any obscene or indecent exposure” of the person. Appellant was also charged with committing a “lewd, obscene or indecent act” arising out of the same situation. The court acquitted him of this last charge.
As no photographs were taken by either side, the description of the location where the offenses were committed was obtained from the testimony of the witnesses given in reference to a diagram placed on a blackboard, which, unfortunately,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Stephen KramerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Sunshine Book Co. v. SummerfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. CrimminsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Sunshine Book Company and Solair Union Naturisme, Inc. v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Individually and as Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. RockerHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- District of Columbia v. WaltersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Duvallon v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- P. B. I. C., Inc. v. ByrneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1970
- State v. SousaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.