Brock v. Waldron
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The complaint alleged that "said decedent’s death was caused solely by the reckless, careless and negligent operation of defendant’s automobile,” and assigned the usual negligence specifications. At the close of the evidence the court discovered in the requests to charge a claim of wanton misconduct and inquired of counsel, “Where do you get wanton misconduct in this case?” The reply was, “If the jury found this man was driving the automobile carelessly, and should have had an idea this man would be on that road, wouldn’t that be wanton misconduct?” The court replied, “I should say not. If I…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Ascher v. H. E. Friedman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Coner v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Vanderkruik v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Riordan v. GouinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Warner v. Leslie-Elliott Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Sheiman v. Lafayette Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.