Legal Opinion

Brock v. Waldron

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 25, 1940PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

The complaint alleged that "said decedent’s death was caused solely by the reckless, careless and negligent operation of defendant’s automobile,” and assigned the usual negligence specifications. At the close of the evidence the court discovered in the requests to charge a claim of wanton misconduct and inquired of counsel, “Where do you get wanton misconduct in this case?” The reply was, “If the jury found this man was driving the automobile carelessly, and should have had an idea this man would be on that road, wouldn’t that be wanton misconduct?” The court replied, “I should say not. If I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Ascher v. H. E. Friedman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Coner v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Vanderkruik v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Riordan v. GouinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Warner v. Leslie-Elliott Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Sheiman v. Lafayette Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API