Coner v. Chittenden
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The plaintiff was injured while riding as a guest in a car owned and operated by the named defendant. She can recover in this action only upon proof that her injuries were caused by the defendant’s heedless and reckless disregard of her rights within the meaning and intent of the so-called guest statute. General Statutes, § 1628. The trial court, after a careful review of the facts, concluded that it would not be warranted in interfering with the verdict of the jury and denied the defendant’s motion to set it aside. The jury might reasonably have found the following facts: On November 27th,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Bordonaro v. SenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Roma v. Thames River Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Ascher v. H. E. Friedman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Lawler, Admr. v. Hartford Street Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Scott v. GardnerTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Brock v. WaldronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- L. E. Whitham Const. Co. v. RemerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Ryan v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Rose v. HeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.