Legal Opinion

Vanderkruik v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 16, 1934PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

Giving the verdict the fullest support to be had from a favorable interpretation of the evidence, we conclude that the jury could reasonably have found: that the plaintiff’s decedent was a gratuitous passenger in the Mitchell automobile operated by Arthur Mitchell, at half past twelve on the morning of November 3d, 1933; he was seated on the right end of the front seat and between him and the driver was another passenger; the seat was a wide one and furnished room for the three occupants without interfering with the operation of the car; Arthur Mitchell and the young lady seated at his right,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Bordonaro v. SenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Ziman v. WhitleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Ascher v. H. E. Friedman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brock v. WaldronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Smith v. MeadowsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Law v. GallegherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  4. Mooney v. WabrekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  5. Garrett v. HowdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API