Riordan v. Gouin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
Plaintiffs in these cases, which were tried together, were injured while riding as guests in a car owned by the named defendant and operated by his son, the other defendant, hereinafter referred to as the defendant. They can recover in this action only upon proof that their injuries were caused by the defendant’s heedless and reckless disregard of their rights within the meaning and intent of the so-called guest statute. General Statutes, § 1628. The jury might reasonably have found the following facts: The defendant and a friend, Moran, had taken the plaintiffs to a dinner dance in Woodmont.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Rindge v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Leete v. Griswold PostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Ascher v. H. E. Friedman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Potz v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brock v. WaldronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Garrett v. HowdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Starkel v. Edward Balf Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Gantenbein v. HuckleberryOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Bowen v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.