Legal Opinion
Seven-Up Bottling Co. v. United States
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 21, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 9023PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.
In this action which seeks refund of taxes paid, the United States has served notice to take the deposition of one George C. Haas, an expert witness who has been named by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff has objected to the taking of the deposition and has requested that the Court enter an appropriate protective *2order. Attorneys’ affidavits have been filed and the matter now stands submitted.
Involved herein is the question of appropi-iate valuation of certain corporate assets under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Government maintains that it must…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stovall v. Gulf & South American Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
- Maginnis v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
- Hoagland v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Horace MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Norfin, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1977
- Epright v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Smith v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 2006